Just the facts by Robert W Malone MD, MS for Who Is Robert Malone? – SubStack
I apologize in advance to most of you for sending this out, but a recent article by Peter and Ginger Breggin, coupled with a social media/email campaign by them, has caused considerable confusion and questions to be raised. I provide the following so that each reader can make their own assessment of the truthfulness of what the Breggins have written in their most recent article and email concerning myself and this legal case.
Suffice to say, it is no fun to take a 12h flight back from Istanbul after attending a strategy session of international leaders in the medical freedom movement to land and discover yet another written attack campaign coming at me, including from people who I had once considered colleagues and fellow warriors.
As some of you may be aware, I find this all deeply disturbing and depressing. At one point, I just wanted to walk away, but support of friends and family (and the Toronto and Florida medical freedom communities) got me through that. I thought it had died down since we filed the lawsuit last October, but now it is back again.
Support Our Site
Now is your chance to support Gospel News Network.
We love helping others and believe that’s one of the reasons we are chosen as Ambassadors of the Kingdom, to serve God’s children. We look to the Greatest Commandment as our Powering force.
I did not seek this, I did not provoke this, and I repeatedly sought to get the defendants to stop attacking me (and Dr. Mattias Desmet), finally including sending a cease and desist legal letter to the defendants. Which prompted yet another attack which was further amplified on social media. I was left with no other option. The determination of the damages claimed was made by my attorney, who is very experienced in defamation cases, and who represents many of the physicians involved in the medical freedom movement.
Do your own diligence, and make your own assessment (if you care).
As this involves a pending legal case, I will keep my comments quite brief and let the reader draw their own conclusions. The legal risk being that I make some statement which will compromise the proceedings.
I will allow and read comments, but will not be able to respond. I hope that you can understand the context and decision.
For additional background, please see the following prior substack articles, which many of you are already well familiar with:
Is Mattias Desmet an expert in Mass Formation or a Trojan Horse?
Response to Breggin and Breggin (Part 1)
Business Models Based on Fear and Rage are bad for your health
A little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing in the hands of the uninformed
When will they ever learn (to do their research before popping off with conspiracies)?
Why did I invent the mRNA vax tech?
Inquiring minds “need” to know. “For the Sake of Humanity”?
Robert Malone Responds to Trolls
LifeSite News 23Sep22 interview clip
Power and Strategy of False Narratives
Factchecking claims that the GCS and I support COVID-19 genetic vaccination
Some notes on the tragicomic attempt to burn me at the stake.
Guest essay by Professor Dr. Mattias Desmet in response to his concerted attacks from left and right
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Dr. Robert W. Malone (“Plaintiff” or “Dr. Malone”), by counsel, pursuant to Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Rules”), files the following Complaint against Defendants, Peter R. Breggin, M.D. (“Breggin”), Ginger Ross Breggin (“Ginger Breggin”), America Out Loud, Dr. Jane Ruby (“Ruby”) and Red Voice Media, jointly and severally.
