More Manmade Pandemics Are Coming — Here’s Why By
- Early on in the COVID-19 pandemic, Francis Boyle, Ph.D., was sure it was the result of a lab leak. He believes monkeypox is another lab creation, as it now suddenly has 30 mutations from the wild monkeypox found in Africa.
- President Biden recently signed the “Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe and Secure American Bioeconomy,” and this order basically promises we’ll see additional manmade pandemics.
- Section 12, paragraph VII in Biden’s executive order states that the purpose of the order is to “develop and work and promote and implement … dual-use research of concern, and research involving potentially pandemic and other high-consequence pathogens.”
- That means they intend to perform gain-of-function research on deadly pathogens, any one of which could be released to create a global pandemic when a scare event is necessary to trick populations into choosing a false sense of safety over freedom. Boyle believes there’s no doubt there will be additional pandemics, because they’re intentionally creating them.
- Boyle believes monkeypox was engineered and released in an effort to scare governments and populations into accepting the World Health Organization’s pandemic treaty, which would make the World Health Organization the sole decision-maker in pandemic situations.
In this interview, repeat guest Francis Boyle (video below) — whose background includes an undergraduate degree from the University of Chicago, a juris doctor (lawyer) degree from Harvard and a Ph.D. in political science — shares his views on the latest efforts to instill fear in the public, this time about monkeypox.
For decades, Boyle has advocated against the development and use of bioweapons, which COVID-19 appears to be. He called for biowarfare legislation at the Biological Weapons Convention of 1972, and drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, which was passed unanimously by both houses of Congress and signed into law by George Bush, Sr. in 1989.
Early on in the pandemic, Boyle was sure COVID-19 was the result of a lab leak. In fact, he was one of the first to bring that up. Of course, for the past two-plus years, anyone who shared the lab leak theory was vilified, discredited, censored and deplatformed.
Today, we know that information was true, and even mainstream media are starting to report on it.
White House admits more pandemics will be created
As detailed in “Executive Order Advances Biotech-Transhumanist Agenda,” President Biden recently signed the “Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe and Secure American Bioeconomy.”
As noted by Boyle, this executive order basically ensures the creation of additional bioweapons:
“It’s a very lengthy executive order. At the very end, they give it all away, where it says, [in Section 12] Paragraph VII, that the purpose of this is to ‘develop and work and promote and implement … dual-use research of concern, and research involving potentially pandemic and other high-consequence pathogens …’
“Now let me work that out for you. ‘Dual-use research of concern’ means offensive and then defensive biological warfare weapons. The Bidenites admit here that their agenda is to promote and implement more offensive biological warfare weapons. That’s what ‘dual-use research of concern’ means.
“Then, to try to perfect these weapons with some type of bogus vaccine involving reverse engineering or something like that. Notice, they admit they are going to develop these offensive biological warfare weapons, ‘involving potentially pandemic and other high consequence pathogens.’
“They are going to research, develop more biological warfare weapons like COVID-19, that the United States government was involved in. They admit this right here.
“Now, you listen to the mainstream news media and everyone is saying ‘Yes, the next pandemic is coming.’ This is where it is coming from — right here, ‘dual-use research of concern involving potentially pandemic and other high consequence pathogens.’”
Executive order cannot override bioweapons convention
If you wonder whether this kind of dual-use bioweapons research might violate the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, the answer is yes. The 1989 act directly prohibits this kind of activity. But beyond its unlawfulness, Boyle’s primary concern is that it’s existentially dangerous to continue down this path.
“COVID-19, which I was the first to blow the whistle on, was clearly an offensive biological warfare weapon with gain of function properties that had leaked out of that Wuhan BSL-4, China’s Fort Detrick. The Bidenites have made it clear they’re going full speed ahead. They have crossed the Rubicon. They do not intend to turn back. They’re doubling down, they’re tripling down. In my opinion, this is what confronts us now today.”
While some claim an executive order can override a previous law and/or signed treaty, according to Boyle, this is incorrect on both accounts.
“No, an executive order cannot override my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, and it cannot override the Biological Weapons Convention,” he says. “This is just an in-run around both of them — an attempted in-run, despite the fact that violation of my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act is a felony punishable by life imprisonment.
The Department of Justice did want me, repeatedly, to put the death penalty in there, but I’m a lifelong abolitionist and I did not want any statute of mine to carry the death penalty.”
So, then, which takes precedence? And how do we resolve or reconcile this conflict?
According to Boyle, no reconciliation is possible, barring new legislation by Congress:
“Whoever drafted this [executive order] knew full well that they were violating the Biological Weapons Convention and my Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act. An executive order cannot supersede either a treaty or a statute. Only a subsequent statute by Congress could do that.”
Resisting medical tyranny
A related tangent brought up in the interview is how the Emergency Powers Act has been misused to strip us of personal freedoms and liberties. Essentially, this pandemic has demonstrated that you can turn a democratically elected Congress into a tyrannical regime that can rule without restraint.
Boyle recently published a book in which he discusses this, titled “Resisting Medical Tyranny: Why the COVID-19 Mandates Are Criminal.” In it, he also details how we can fight against this tyrannical overreach using peaceful and entirely legal means.
Justification for enslavement: Biosecurity
This is really important, and brings us to the issue of monkeypox, which was declared a public health emergency in late July, as it cuts to the core of the global cabal’s strategy to enslave the world by progressively chipping away at our personal freedoms under the justification of “biosecurity.”
As noted by Boyle:
“In my opinion, this monkeypox epidemic … was a biological warfare weapon with gain of function properties that came out of someone’s lab and was released in multiple locations to scare people. Why?
“I don’t think it was a coincidence at all that the World Health Organization [WHO], their meeting at the World Health Assembly (WHA) was considering regulations that would have done, once again, an in-run over and around the sovereignty of the United States of America and our state and local governments to control our health care.
“Under the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, public health falls within the control of state and local governments, not the federal government. That is why, down there in Florida or in Texas, you can have governors adopting different policies from [those] issued by the CDC [Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention] in Washington, D.C.
“You have several governors now rebelling against these totalitarian dictatorial [edicts] coming out of Washington, D.C., In order to try to stop that, they came up with these regulations that they tried to get through the World Health Assembly earlier this summer, and that failed.
“The monkeypox, in my opinion, was then released in order to scare the governments of the world into accepting these regulations. That failed but … the WHO is now meeting to negotiate and conclude a treaty that will fold into it the same WHA regulations …
“The purpose of this [global] WHO treaty, once again, is to do an in-run around American sovereignty to make decisions at a state and local basis as to how to treat matters of public health in the next pandemic, which they know is coming, because they’re already preparing for it in accordance with the biotech executive order that I just quoted to you.
“They know it’s coming. They’re preparing it. They’re getting it ready. The next time, by means of this WHO treaty, they will then attempt to argue that the treaty is the supreme law of the land under Article VI of the U.S. Constitution and therefore trumps and displaces the ability of state and local governments … to determine public health.
“Indeed, there is a Supreme Court case to that effect that they know all about, Missouri vs. Holland, that if a treaty is concluded, it does override the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We have to understand these people know exactly what they are doing, and we have to stop them.”
Call on the U.S. Senate to reject WHO treaty
The WHO met in Washington, D.C., from Sept. 26 through Sept. 30, and according to Boyle, treaty discussions were part of that session. Boyle suggests we need to call on our senators to sign a letter that they will vote against any WHO treaty coming down the line, and then forward that letter to the World Health Assembly, the WHO and member nations.
“If we can get one-third plus one members of the United States Senate to sign [such a letter], I think that will kill this proposed treaty,” Boyle says.
Other nations could do the same. To be clear, this WHO treaty is global in nature, so the U.S. is not the only country that stands to lose its sovereignty were it to pass. All member states are in the same boat.
“If the treaty gets passed, then they will use that treaty to enforce WHO [recommendations] all over the world on the handling of the next pandemic, and that will get us all killed,” Boyle says.
“The WHO is a rotten, corrupt, criminal organization, and the proof of that is [that] the WHO is a sponsoring institution of the Wuhan BSL-4, which is China’s Fort Detrick.
“Imagine if the WHO were a sponsoring organization of our Fort Dietrich. We would know the cat was out of the bag. That’s exactly what’s going on here with the WHO.
“The CDC, Bill Gates, the Chinese Communist government and Big Pharma that pay for the WHO will force everyone to continue to take more vaccines … and more boosters, forever. There’ll be no end to it.”
At present, it seems they will simply continue to push until the treaty passes. Getting at more than one-third of the U.S. Senate to reject any possible treaty with the WHO, now or in the future, may be the only way to stop it permanently.
“[The treaty] will probably pass the WHO assembly,” Boyle says. “The U.S. government representative could sign it and then they would send it to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for ratification by the Senate.”
“We need to head this off as soon as we can with this letter [signed by] one-third plus one of the Senate, just saying ‘We’re going to reject it.’ We have to start lobbying now against the treaty. We’ll have limited time once it goes to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Remember, the Democrats control the Senate. They control the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
“They could get it through very quickly to present it to the full Senate. We have to go all out to stop this treaty. You’re down there in Florida. I would certainly hope you could alert Governor DeSantis to the dangers here. His powers will be terminated under the terms of this treaty to regulate all public health.
“He’ll be obligated to obey whatever the WHO tells him to obey. If he does not, then the federal government can go into the United States federal district court and get an injunction under the treaty, mandating that he comply, and if he does not, he could be fined if not jailed for contempt. It’s a very dangerous situation.”