They are desperately trying to make you believe the virus came from nature. No way.

Randolph Jason

They are desperately trying to make you believe the virus came from nature. No way. by Steve Kirsch – SubStack

Executive summary

Two studies were just published in a peer-reviewed journal on the same day:

  1. Spatial study: The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan was the early epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic
  2. Genomic study: The molecular epidemiology of multiple zoonotic origins of SARS-CoV-2

Their conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 came out of nature


Now is your chance to support Gospel News Network.

We love helping others and believe that’s one of the reasons we are chosen as Ambassadors of the Kingdom, to serve God’s children. We look to the Greatest Commandment as our Powering force.

$
Personal Info

Donation Total: $100.00

My conclusion: it definitely was a lab leak.

Introduction

Here’s what you need to know:

  1. Kristian Andersen is an author of both papers. What a coincidence! He was on the original call with Fauci after the breakout and participated in the cover up to make it look like it came from nature.
  2. Kristian Andersen blocked Chris Martenson and then deleted all his tweets after Chris Martenson called him out. Is that how science works?
  3. Andersen initially told Fauci the virus was man made in an email on Feb 1, 2022 that you can see right here (at 19:00). He said it was inconsistent with evolutionary theory. Then there are redactions to the FOIA emails and then a week later, there is a paper on how the virus came from nature. Pretty hard to cover that one up. Chris Martenson did a great series on this. It’s really hard to believe this wasn’t from a lab if you take the time to watch Chris’s video. It is awesome. If you are short on time, watch from 19:00 for at least 2 minutes. It’s one of my favorite Chris Martenson videos ever and it is the best 2 minutes you’ll ever spend if you are wondering where the virus came from.
    The email where the virus was determined to be man-made by Kristian Andersen’s team (see 19:00). But a week later, it was of natural origin!!!
  4. Why now? Why didn’t we have this before? And the papers came out at the exact same day 2.5 years later? Just a coincidence. Sounds like a coordinated PR plan to me.
  5. How do we know the Chinese government didn’t manipulate the data on spread?
  6. Why did the Chinese government allow the data to be released all of a sudden?
  7. Li-Meng Yan said the virus was deliberately released from the lab. So how do we know they didn’t release it at the wet market to make it LOOK like it jumped from animals? It’s the perfect cover story. And all the cases reported would be consistent with a wet market origin since that is where it was released. The perfect crime.

Continue Reading / Steve Kirsch – SubStack >>>

Related posts