Exposing the false religion of the Great Awokening By Robin Schumacher, for Christian Post
Twisting the path of Christian revelation, most all false religions follow the same five steps.
It starts with (1) a false prophet who then writes or uses, (2) a false authority to then proclaim, (3) a false god, (4) a false savior and, (5) a false salvation.
For example, Mormonism has (1) Joseph Smith who delivers (2) the book of Mormon, which proclaims that (3) the god of our world used to be a man and (4) “another Jesus” (2 Cor. 11:4) who “attained godhood” which others can accomplish and finally (5) a plan of salvation that says “One of the most fallacious doctrines originated by Satan and propounded by man is that man is saved alone by the grace of God, that belief in Jesus Christ alone is all that is needed for salvation.”
Now is your chance to support Gospel News Network.
We love helping others and believe that’s one of the reasons we are chosen as Ambassadors of the Kingdom, to serve God’s children. We look to the Greatest Commandment as our Powering force.
Pick your poison, i.e., your false religion, and you will see the same pattern.[1] This includes the religion being broadcast today through what many are calling “the Great Awokening”.
Another head of the same hydra
The Great Awakening was a period of profound Christian religious interest that began in the early to mid-1700’s in New England and spread throughout the American colonies. Jonathan Edwards is typically recognized as the most prominent theologian of the Awakening, while George Whitefield is seen as its greatest evangelist.
To understand the Great Awokening of today, we have to go back much further than the 1700’s to understand its anti-God roots and how it got to where it is now. In short, it is simply another head of the false religious hydra, humanism.
Humanism’s prophets can be traced back to the Greek philosopher Protagoras (c. 481 – 411 B.C.) who is credited with coining humanism’s mantra: “Man is the measure of all things, of those that are, of those that are not that they are not.” About this statement, agnostic and skeptic Bertrand Russell forebodingly says, “This is interpreted as meaning that each man is the measure of all things, and that, when men differ, there is no objective truth in virtue of which one is right and the other wrong.”
